CC (Cheng and Cheng) Medium

image_pdfimage_print

CC (Cheng and Cheng) Medium in Plant Tissue Culture: Origins, Uses, and Formulation

Origin:

The CC medium, named for its developers, Cheng and Cheng, emerged in the late 1970s, although the exact publication year isn’t consistently cited across sources. Unlike Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium developed earlier, CC medium wasn’t aimed at a broad range of plant species. Instead, it was specifically formulated to address the challenges associated with the in vitro propagation of woody plants, a notoriously difficult group to work with in tissue culture. The original intention was to create a medium that would effectively induce callus formation, shoot proliferation, and ultimately, root development in recalcitrant woody species. This focus on woody plants sets it apart from more general-purpose media.

Applications:

CC medium found its niche in the propagation of several woody plant species, proving particularly effective for certain genera within the Rosaceae (roses, apples, pears) and some other horticultural plants. Its primary applications include:

  • Callus Induction: CC medium’s formulation facilitates the dedifferentiation of plant tissues, leading to the formation of undifferentiated callus tissue, a crucial first step in many tissue culture protocols.
  • Shoot Organogenesis: From the induced callus, shoots can be developed using appropriate adjustments to the growth regulator concentrations within the medium.
  • Root Induction: Once shoots are formed, CC medium, often with modified hormone levels, promotes the development of roots, leading to complete plantlets ready for acclimatization and transfer to soil.
  • Micropropagation: The entire process using CC medium allows for the rapid and mass multiplication of elite plant material, preserving valuable genotypes and facilitating efficient propagation of hard-to-propagate species.

While not as widely used as MS media, successful studies utilizing CC medium for micropropagation have been reported for various species, though specific examples with clear citations are less readily available in the open literature compared to MS-based studies. This might be attributed to the medium’s specialized application, focusing on a smaller group of plants.

Formulation:

The precise formulation of CC medium can vary slightly depending on the specific application and plant species. However, a typical composition includes the following components:

ComponentConcentration (mg/L)Role
NH₄NO₃1650Nitrogen source
KNO₃1900Nitrogen and potassium source
CaCl₂·2H₂O440Calcium source
MgSO₄·7H₂O370Magnesium and sulfur source
KH₂PO₄170Phosphorus and potassium source
NaCl25Sodium source
FeSO₄·7H₂O27.8Iron source
MnSO₄·H₂O2.2Manganese source
ZnSO₄·7H₂O0.22Zinc source
KI0.83Iodine source
H₃BO₃6.2Boron source
Na₂MoO₄·2H₂O0.25Molybdenum source
CuSO₄·5H₂O0.025Copper source
CoCl₂·6H₂O0.025Cobalt source
Nicotinic Acid0.5Vitamin
Pyridoxine HCl0.5Vitamin
Thiamine HCl0.1Vitamin
Myo-inositol100Vitamin/osmoprotectant
Sucrose30000Carbon source
Agar8000Gelling agent

Growth Regulators: The concentrations of plant growth regulators (PGRs) like auxins (e.g., NAA, 2,4-D) and cytokinins (e.g., BA, Kin) are highly variable and depend entirely on the specific experimental goal (callus induction, shoot proliferation, rooting) and the plant species being cultured. Often, adjustments are made to the standard formulation to optimize the desired response.

Conclusion:

CC medium, while not as universally employed as MS or B5 media, holds a valuable place in plant tissue culture, particularly for woody species. Its strengths lie in its effectiveness in inducing callus and regenerating plants in challenging woody plant systems where MS or B5 media might prove less successful. The limitations primarily stem from its specialized nature; it’s not a suitable ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution like MS. It often requires careful optimization of PGR concentrations for each species and culture goal, increasing the experimentation required. Moreover, the stability of auxins in the medium might also constitute to less efficient results in long-term tissue cultures.

Compared to MS medium, which is broadly applicable across diverse plant species, CC medium demonstrates higher efficiency for certain woody plants but lacks the versatility of MS. Similarly, B5 medium, often preferred for some monocots and certain dicots, might offer better results than CC for species outside the niche it was designed for. CC’s relevance in modern plant biotechnology continues as a useful tool alongside the broader-scoped options. It remains a valuable asset for researchers working specifically with woody plants that are challenging to propagate using other media.